Heterogeneous Engineering and the Mitigation of Fukushima and Other Complex Systems Disasters — 12/11/2013

“Whenever we start looking at a disaster we need to think of it as the failure of an “heterogeneous system” because whatever has gone wrong represents a necessarily tangled and complex network of technical relations, social relations and natural relations.”

“If we are to understand “disaster”-or more generally “complexity”-then we need to find a way of thinking that articulates the fact that “all” the relations that we’re looking at are simultaneously natural, social, and technological-We need to think about “heterogeneity”.”

“Attempts to avoid disaster are also working to generate the conditions for disaster.”

“Complex systems, coupling (tightly coupled, complex, quick; loosely coupled, simple, slow), complexity (ramified, complex; linear, simple)”

“We need to be able to talk engineering, sociology, science and economics, all at the same time, and, more or less, case by case…..”

(John Law, Center for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC)

http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011HeterogeneousEngineeringAndTinkering.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Callon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruno_Latour
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Law_(sociologist)
http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/staff/people-profile.php?name=John_Law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_technology_studies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor-network_theory

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s